Are WR's on the block? - Page 2 - NFL UK Forums
NFL UK Mobile Logo
Go Back   NFL UK Forums > 32 NFL Teams > New Orleans Saints

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 29.04.2010, 03:06 PM
MarkC07's Avatar
MarkC07 MarkC07 is offline
All Pro
 
Join Date: 11.12.2007
Posts: 1,852
Send a message via MSN to MarkC07
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DeanMoriarty View Post
Lance Moore had a really good season in 2008/09 when Colston was out injured. Henderson is a deep threat, Meachem yes! But Lance Moore is one of the best slot receivers out there to let him go would be a mistake.

Having said that, Bree's precision makes any wideout look good.
Don't agree on Moore at all tbh, he's very expendable in our offense. He barely played at all last year and we managed to get trough fine without him. One of the best slot receivers out there is a bit of a outlandish statement also, like you said, there are lots of receivers that could put up his 08/09 numbers with Brees throwing it to them.

Don't get me wrong I like him and I think he's a good wide-out but I wouldn't be too upset if we let him go because he would be easy enough to replace in our offense.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 30.04.2010, 01:28 PM
marcseven's Avatar
marcseven marcseven is offline
Team Captain
 
Join Date: 30.01.2010
Posts: 268
Default

After chewing it over i feel Moore too, i would hold onto Colston & Meachem's legs like a small child if i though they were going. Getting to like Henderson. Moore is definitely good enough for another team to snap up where as Arrington has hardly been in the shop window.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 01.05.2010, 01:08 AM
Substitute's Avatar
Substitute Substitute is offline
All Pro
 
Join Date: 25.10.2008
Posts: 1,051
Default

Colston is Brees' favourite reciever. Enough siad about him.

But the others are all, in their own way, somewhat expendable. Meachem and Henderson are two of the best deep-threat receivers in the league, but neither are amazing on the short routes. Moore and the TE's are very strong on the short routes.

But the thing is, if Henderson or Meachem or Moore and the TE's drop out that offence keeps rolling because we have depth on offence. Where you have depth you can afford to lose players but then you're leaving it to chance.

There is no reciever (bar perhps Colston) who is not expendable on the Saints roster but it is also important to bear in mind that other teams are not high on the Saints WR. They consider them 'system' products, as Henderson found out last year. We could lose one of these receivers 'easily' but I'm not sure we'd get great value for them.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 08.06.2010, 01:57 AM
saints242008's Avatar
saints242008 saints242008 is offline
Starter
 
Join Date: 22.10.2008
Posts: 99
Default

Whilst Colston is the go to guy and number 1, i remember 2-3 seasons ago watching a clip where Brees himself said that he liked Moore more than anyone. I believe Moore is the one guy that is on the edge of being let go wether it be by trade or release, he is in Brees's books so i think that gives him a chance.

Meachem this has to be his year of making a run to push Colston for the number 1 spot or at least make his spot as number 2.

Henderson will be used to keep defence's thinking pass and worried about the deep threat, opening the field for Thomas and Bush.

Bush you could say is above or below Henderson which to me is kind of pushing out Arrington.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 18.07.2010, 07:35 PM
Saintsfan62's Avatar
Saintsfan62 Saintsfan62 is offline
Pro
 
Join Date: 27.03.2010
Posts: 61
Default

I would rather have moore over arrington but colston/meachem/henderson are all definite stays
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +0. The time now is 08:26 PM.