the BENGALS thread - Page 2 - NFL UK Forums
NFL UK Mobile Logo
Go Back   NFL UK Forums > 32 NFL Teams > Cincinnati Bengals

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 02.02.2006, 11:57 AM
Dragonic's Avatar
Dragonic Dragonic is offline
MVP
 
Join Date: 19.10.2005
Posts: 7,071
Default Re:the BENGALS thread

Finally a Bengals thread

Anywyas dont know if youve seen this yet but the schedule for next season is out, no times and dates yet but the opponents are listed.

http://www.bengals.com/team/06schedule_preview.asp

Sorry if its old news but i hadnt seen it anywhere

Tough Schedule i feel for next year
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 03.02.2006, 07:22 PM
ravin raven ravin raven is offline
All Pro
 
Join Date: 17.10.2005
Posts: 2,269
Default Re:the BENGALS thread

all of the afc north teams join together to make the AFC NORTH thread, no need for individual threads but having said that, it seems to be over run by smug steelers fans (if they win the SB...... :'() so individual threads is good until they get beaten
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 03.02.2006, 08:58 PM
Michael Burton's Avatar
Michael Burton Michael Burton is offline
All Pro
 
Join Date: 04.09.2003
Posts: 2,497
Default Re:the BENGALS thread

[quote author=ravin raven (panthers let me down....seahawks all the way!!) link=board=1;threadid=17310;start=0#msg423058 date=1138994551]
all of the afc north teams join together to make the AFC NORTH thread, no need for individual threads but having said that, it seems to be over run by smug steelers fans (if they win the SB...... :'() so individual threads is good until they get beaten
[/quote]

Well, it makes a change from all those smug Ravens fans thinking they have a shot at the AFC North title every year.



[move]Where are the Bungals ???[/move]
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 03.02.2006, 11:24 PM
bright_blue_shorts's Avatar
bright_blue_shorts bright_blue_shorts is offline
All Pro
 
Join Date: 19.09.2003
Posts: 3,762
Default Re:the BENGALS thread

I've added the Bengals thread to the "Links to Teams & Divisions".

It's entirely up to individuals whether they post in here or the AFC North thread.

Sometimes there are just things you want to keep inhouse.

BBS
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 04.02.2006, 01:08 PM
BengalBoy's Avatar
BengalBoy BengalBoy is offline
All Pro
 
Join Date: 13.01.2004
Posts: 3,626
Default Re:the BENGALS thread

I prefer to be in the AFC North thread myself
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 11.02.2006, 09:19 PM
Horrorshow's Avatar
Horrorshow Horrorshow is offline
All Pro
 
Join Date: 16.10.2005
Posts: 8,307
Default Too late, judge says in dismissing suit vs. Bengals, NFL

Interesting article from CBS Sportsline.com

Too late, judge says in dismissing suit vs. Bengals, NFL

A judge on Thursday dismissed Hamilton County's federal antitrust lawsuit against the Cincinnati Bengals and the National Football League because the suit was not filed within the four-year statute of limitations.

U.S. District Judge S. Arthur Spiegel threw out the suit without getting to the merits of the county's argument that the Bengals misled taxpayers and officials by contending they needed a new stadium to be profitable and might move if they didn't get one.

Hamilton County taxpayers in 1996 approved a one-half-cent sales tax increase to finance the $450 million Paul Brown Stadium. Commissioners signed a lease with the Bengals the following year.

The antitrust lawsuit was not filed until 2003, three years after the Bengals began using the stadium.

"To be sure, the lease that Hamilton County enjoys with the Bengals is highly favorable -- perhaps egregiously so -- to the Bengals," Spiegel wrote.

He said prior members of the board were aware of allegations that league and its teams wielded unlawful antitrust power to obtain favorable leases, but by not filing suit sooner the chance "was lost to the passage of time."

"We are pleased that Judge Spiegel took the time to thoroughly analyze the case and conclude that the facts were on our side," Bengals owner Mike Brown said in a statement released by the team.

NFL spokesman Greg Aiello said the league believes Spiegel's opinion demonstrates there was no basis for the county's claims.

Commissioner Todd Portune said he favored discussing all options with attorneys, including an appeal, filing a lawsuit in state court or seeking to reopen negotiations with the Bengals.

It was Portune who originally filed suit against the Bengals as an individual taxpayer. When conflict-of-interest questions arose regarding his position as a commissioner, community activist Carrie Davis took his place as lead plaintiff.

Eventually, county commissioners took over the suit.

Portune said Thursday that the Bengals were largely to blame for the county facing a deficit of $191 million.

In February 2004, Spiegel rejected the NFL's motion to dismiss the case, ruling that Davis could pursue her claims that the NFL violated federal antitrust provisions by using its monopoly to "extort" new stadiums and highly favorable lease terms.

In his ruling Thursday, Spiegel explained why he did not rule at that time that the statute of limitations had expired. He said a new standard was applied when the county commission took over the suit, based not on what an outsider like Davis could know about negotiations but what commissioners knew or should have known.

Spiegel noted that county officials knew all along that the Bengals were profitable, although the lawsuit alleged that the statute of limitations started not in 1997 but in May 2001 when commissioners got a clearer image of profits based on information in a lawsuit between the league and Oakland Raiders owner Al Davis.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 11.02.2006, 09:44 PM
ROVERBOY's Avatar
ROVERBOY ROVERBOY is offline
All Pro
 
Join Date: 05.10.2003
Posts: 2,908
Default Re:the BENGALS thread

They did well this year and maybe if they could have pipped Denver for 2nd seeds then things might have been different.

I expect them to be in the play-offs next year especially if Carson gets over the knee injury.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 21.03.2006, 02:11 PM
Carson2Chad Carson2Chad is offline
Pro
 
Join Date: 14.03.2006
Posts: 99
Default Re:the BENGALS thread

It's being reported that Carson Palmer is "about 4 weeks" ahead of his scheduled rehab. He has been doing intense water rehab in California which has accelerated things. ;D

I really hope that is true.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 21.03.2006, 06:25 PM
Orange County Orange County is offline
All Pro
 
Join Date: 13.08.2005
Posts: 251
Default Re:the BENGALS thread

From the Official Bengals Newsletter

Quote:
Carson Palmer's press conference from Paul Brown Stadium originally scheduled for Tuesday was postponed because of a spring snowstorm in Cincinnati. The first update on his rehabilitation following Jan. 10 surgery has been rescheduled for Wednesday at 11:45 a.m ET.

Bengals.com will have LIVE audio coverage of the press conference available for fans Wednesday beginning at 11:45. Click the Multimedia tab on the bengals.com home page to access the live audio. We will also provide video coverage of the press conference in its entirety shortly after its conclusion. The video can also be accessed via the Multimedia tab.
So hopefully there will be some positive news for the Bengals come to tomorrow.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 20.04.2006, 02:13 PM
Reevzee's Avatar
Reevzee Reevzee is offline
All Pro
 
Join Date: 07.09.2005
Posts: 1,821
Default Re:the BENGALS thread

Has anyone seen the video on www.nfl.com of Chad Johnson "In Their Own Words". Really good. He starts the day with McDonalds which I think is brilliant! Really funny guy and one of the best recievers in the league!

Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +0. The time now is 09:51 PM.